Skip to main content

Austin and central Texas · Travis · Williamson · Hays · Bastrop

Injury types in a Texas claim, explained

What your injury is changes how it has to be proved, what an insurer will argue about it, and how long it takes to know what you are dealing with. This page explains the nine injuries that come up most often in Texas claims: what each one is, how it is documented, and what usually gets disputed. Se habla español.

(512) 500-2810

Call now and speak with a lawyer today.

Rather have us call you? Fill out the form and we will reach you today.

We handle injury claims across Austin, Round Rock, Georgetown, San Marcos, Pflugerville, Cedar Park, Leander, Kyle, Buda, Hutto, Taylor, Manor, Bastrop, Lakeway, Bee Cave and Dripping Springs.

Free consultation · No fee unless we win · Immigration status does not stop a claim

Why the injury type changes the claim

Two people in the same crash can have completely different claims, and the reason is usually the injury rather than the collision. A broken bone announces itself on an X-ray the same day. A disc injury may not be visible on the imaging taken in the emergency room at all, because that imaging was looking for something else.

That difference decides three practical things: how long it takes before anyone knows the real extent of the harm, what evidence is capable of proving it, and which argument the insurer is going to make.

The nine injuries below account for most of what comes through a Texas personal injury practice. Each one is explained on its own terms, because the honest answer to "how serious is this" is different for each.

Nothing on this page values a claim or predicts an outcome. It explains what each injury is and how it is proved. What any individual claim is worth depends on facts no web page can see.

How an injury is proved in a Texas claim, whatever it is

Before the specific injuries, the common spine. Every injury claim in Texas is built out of the same four things, and a weakness in any one of them is where the dispute lands.

The medical record, made at the time

What you told a provider, when, and what they found. Contemporaneous records carry weight precisely because they were made before anyone was thinking about a claim. This is why the gap between the incident and the first medical visit matters so much: it is the single most common thing an adjuster points at.

Objective findings, where they exist

Imaging, nerve conduction studies, range-of-motion measurements, surgical findings. Some injuries produce these readily and some do not, which is not the same as some injuries being real and others not. A soft tissue injury can be genuinely disabling and produce a completely normal X-ray.

Causation, connecting the harm to the event

A medical record that says you have a herniated disc proves you have a herniated disc. It does not, on its own, prove the crash caused it. Causation is usually the contested question in any injury where a degenerative explanation is available, which is most of them past a certain age.

The effect on your life, documented

What you cannot do now that you could do before: work, lift, sleep, drive, care for your own children. Texas allows recovery for non-economic harm, and Chapter 41 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code governs how damages are categorised and awarded. This element is proved by ordinary evidence, not medical evidence, and it is the one most often under-documented.

Texas also has a specific mechanism for getting medical records and bills into evidence without calling every provider to testify: an affidavit under Chapter 18 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. It is procedural, but it is why the completeness of your records matters more than the number of them.

Neck, back and soft tissue injuries

These four are grouped because they share one problem: the injury is real, the pain is real, and the imaging is often unremarkable. That gap between what a person feels and what a scan shows is the entire battleground.

What is a whiplash injury, and why is it disputed?

Whiplash describes a mechanism rather than a single diagnosis: the head is thrown rapidly forward and back, straining the muscles, ligaments and other soft tissue of the neck beyond their normal range. Symptoms commonly appear hours or a day later rather than at the scene, which is medically ordinary and is nonetheless used to argue that nothing happened in the collision. It is disputed because it rarely appears on an X-ray, not because it is rarely real.

People ask this as "my neck hurts after a car accident but the X-ray was normal".

What is a neck injury beyond whiplash?

The cervical spine has seven vertebrae separated by discs, with the spinal cord running through them. Injuries range from muscular strain through disc bulges and herniations to fracture. A herniated cervical disc can press on a nerve root and produce pain, numbness or weakness travelling down an arm — symptoms that are felt away from the actual injury, which is one reason they get misattributed.

Also called cervical strain, cervical disc injury, pinched nerve in the neck.

What is a back injury in a claim context?

Most commonly the lumbar spine, the lower five vertebrae that carry the body's load. The same range applies: strain, disc bulge, herniation, fracture. Radiating pain down a leg indicates nerve root involvement. Back injuries are the most likely of any injury to attract a pre-existing condition argument, because degenerative change in the lumbar spine is nearly universal in adults and will be visible on the imaging.

Also called lumbar strain, herniated disc, sciatica.

What is a soft tissue injury?

Damage to muscle, tendon, ligament or other connective tissue rather than to bone. Sprains, strains and tears. The category exists in insurance vocabulary mainly as a way of signalling "minor", which is not what it means medically: a torn ligament can require surgery and produce permanent limitation. What is true is that it is harder to demonstrate objectively, which makes documentation and consistent treatment carry more of the weight.

People ask this as "is a soft tissue injury serious".

A normal X-ray does not mean an uninjured neck or back. X-rays image bone. Soft tissue, discs and nerve roots require different imaging, and emergency departments order imaging to rule out emergencies rather than to document a claim.

Concussion and coma

Brain injuries occupy the opposite end of the evidentiary problem from soft tissue: the consequences can be severe and obvious to family while the standard imaging is clean.

What is a concussion, and can it be serious if scans are normal?

A concussion is a brain injury caused by a blow, jolt or violent movement of the head that disrupts normal brain function. Loss of consciousness is not required and most concussions do not involve it. A CT scan performed in an emergency department is looking for bleeding and skull fracture; a normal CT rules those out and says nothing about whether a concussion occurred. Symptoms including headache, difficulty concentrating, memory problems, light sensitivity, irritability and sleep disturbance can persist well beyond the event.

People ask this as "the CT was normal so do I have a brain injury".

Why are concussions often missed at the scene?

Three reasons that recur. The person is focused on a visible injury and does not mention feeling foggy. Symptoms develop or worsen over the following days. And the people best placed to notice the change — family, coworkers — are not the ones being asked. Documentation of the change by people who knew the person before is often better evidence than any single test.

What is a coma, and what does it mean for a claim?

A prolonged state of unconsciousness from which a person cannot be roused. In a claim it changes the timeline more than anything else: nobody can assess the long-term extent of harm while the person is still in it, and the family is making decisions about care and finances with no information. Where someone does not survive, the claim moves to a different statute entirely — Chapter 71 governs wrongful death and survival actions in Texas.

Paralysis, amputation and burns

These three share a different profile: the injury is not in doubt, the documentation is not the fight, and the questions move to lifetime cost and future care.

What is paralysis and what determines its extent?

Loss of muscle function, and usually sensation, resulting from damage to the spinal cord or nerves. The level of the injury on the spinal cord determines what is affected: damage higher up affects more of the body. Injuries are described as complete or incomplete depending on whether any signal crosses the damaged level, and that distinction drives the entire prognosis. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke publishes an accessible overview of spinal cord injury and its effects.

Also called paraplegia, quadriplegia, tetraplegia.

What does an amputation claim involve?

Loss of a limb or extremity, either in the incident itself or surgically afterwards when the limb cannot be saved. The distinctive features of these claims are prosthetics, which are replaced repeatedly across a lifetime rather than bought once, and the change to how a person earns a living. The harm is permanent and visible, so the dispute is rarely about whether it happened.

What makes a burn injury different?

Burns are classified by depth. Superficial burns affect the outer skin layer; deeper burns reach the tissue beneath and destroy structures that do not regenerate. The features that set burn claims apart are treatment duration, the frequency of repeat surgery including grafting and reconstruction, infection risk during recovery, and permanent scarring. Scarring is compensable harm in Texas in its own right, separately from the medical cost of treating it.

In all three, the practical question early on is whether the available insurance can reach the actual lifetime cost. That is why identifying every applicable policy, including your own uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage under Chapter 1952 of the Insurance Code, matters more in a catastrophic case than in any other.

What insurers argue, and why these four recur

Across every injury type above, the same four arguments come back. Knowing them in advance is most of the defence against them.

The argumentWhat it actually rests on
"It was pre-existing"Degenerative change visible on imaging. Nearly universal in adults past a certain age, and its presence says nothing about whether the incident made a symptom-free condition symptomatic.
"You waited too long to get treatment"A gap between the incident and the first medical visit. Real reasons for gaps — no insurance, no transport, caring for someone else, hoping it would pass — are rarely asked about before the conclusion is drawn.
"The property damage was minor"Photographs of the vehicles. Vehicle damage and occupant injury do not correlate reliably; modern vehicles are engineered to absorb energy without visible deformation.
"You stopped treating, so you recovered"A break in the treatment record. Often it reflects money, work or childcare rather than resolution of symptoms.

None of these is an argument about whether you were hurt. Each is an argument about the record.

The pre-existing condition argument in particular is worth understanding, because Texas law is not on the side of the person making it. A defendant takes the injured person as they find them. That an earlier condition existed does not excuse making it worse.

Deadlines and your share of fault

Two years, in most cases

Texas generally allows two years from the day the cause of action accrues to file a personal injury suit under Chapter 16 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Claims against governmental units carry much shorter notice requirements. Confirm the date for your own facts rather than relying on a web page.

Your percentage of fault, and the 51 percent bar

Under Chapter 33, your recovery is reduced by your percentage of responsibility, and if that percentage is greater than 50 you recover nothing. This is why an insurer works to attach a share of fault to you, and why the documentation described above is not optional.

Reporting, where a vehicle was involved

Chapter 550 of the Transportation Code sets the duties and reporting obligations after a crash. A police report is not required for a claim to exist, but its absence removes a piece of contemporaneous evidence that is difficult to replace later.

Questions people actually ask

Short answers. None is legal advice about your case and none predicts an outcome.

My X-ray was normal. Do I still have a claim?

Possibly. X-rays image bone. Soft tissue, discs and nerve roots do not appear on them, and emergency imaging is ordered to rule out emergencies rather than to document an injury claim. A normal X-ray rules out a fracture and nothing else.

Can I claim if I had a prior back problem?

Yes. A defendant takes the injured person as they find them. An earlier condition does not excuse making it worse. The question becomes what changed, which is why records from before the incident can help rather than hurt.

Is whiplash a real injury?

Yes. It describes a mechanism of injury to the soft tissue of the neck. It is difficult to show on standard imaging, which is a different thing from being difficult to have.

I did not go to a doctor for two weeks. Is my claim over?

No, but the gap will be raised. What helps is the honest reason for it, documented. Gaps caused by lacking insurance, transport or childcare are ordinary and explicable.

The CT scan after my head injury was normal. Could I still have a concussion?

Yes. A CT is looking for bleeding and fracture. A concussion is a disruption of brain function and is not diagnosed by CT. Normal imaging does not exclude it.

How long does a soft tissue injury take to resolve?

It varies enormously and some do not fully resolve. That is a medical question for your treating provider, not one a law firm should answer for you.

Does immigration status affect an injury claim in Texas?

No. Your immigration status does not prevent you from bringing a claim. We do not ask about it and we do not report it.

How much is my injury worth?

Nobody can answer that from a phone call or a web page, and anyone giving you a number before seeing your records and the available coverage is guessing.

Talk to a lawyer about your injury

Free consultation, no fee unless we win, and you speak with the attorney handling your case. If you are not sure how serious your injury is yet, that is a normal place to be and a normal time to call.

Injured in the Austin area? Call now. (512) 500-2810

Medina & Medina Personal Injury Attorneys

6701 Burnet Rd #132, Austin, TX 78757

(512) 500-2810

info@winner.law

¿Prefiere leer esta página en español? Tipos de lesiones explicados.

This page explains general Texas law and general medical concepts. It is not legal advice, it is not medical advice, it does not create an attorney-client relationship, and it does not predict the outcome of any claim. For medical questions, ask your treating provider.

Free Case Evaluation

Get a free review of your case in minutes.

Call now(512) 500-2810

We answer 24/7. The consultation is free.

Or send us your info

Please provide at least a phone number or email.

ConfidentialNo fee unless we win